The amount of weekly temporary total disability benefits is based on the employee's average weekly wage on the date of injury.  Often, the determination of average weekly wage is difficult.  The employee's weekly temporary total disability benefits are paid at the rate of two-thirds of the average weekly wage, subject to certain maximum and minimum rates.  

The maximum and minimum compensation rates for the temporary total disability benefits are controlled by the date of injury.  The object of a wage determination is to arrive at a fair approximation of the employee's probable future earning power that has been impaired or destroyed by the injury.  For regular employment, the weekly wage is arrived at by multiplying the daily wage by the number of  days (and fractional days) normally worked in the business of the employer.  For injuries from October 1, 2008 to the present, the temporary total disability benefit duration has been increased to an absolute maximum of 130 weeks.  

​If you have been injured at work and you are concerned about wage loss benefits please contact either John or myself and we would be happy to discuss what benefits you would be entitled to as a result of your work injury.

Minnesota statute requires that all compensable work injuries must "arise out of and in the course of employment".  The "arising out of" requirement is a "legal causation" test.  For an injury to arise out of employment there must be a causal connection between the employment and the injury.  Minnesota Workers' Compensation courts have developed over the years different theories to try to measure whether a sufficient causal connection between employment and the injury exists.  Five major legal tests arise with consistency:  peculiar risk, increased risk, actual risk, positional risk, and proximate causation.

Increased Risk Test:  The increased risk test has been found by the Minnesota Supreme Court to have been satisfied If the injury follows "as a natural incident of the work...as a result of the exposure occasioned by the nature of the employment."  Foley v. Honeywell, Inc., 488 N.W.2d 268, 271 (Minn. 1992).   An example of an injury that could be found to be compensable due to an an "increased risk" would be if an employee developed asthma after being continually exposed to a dusty work environment.   The theory of compensability would be that the employee having to be exposed to the dust while at work increased the risk of the employee developing asthma.

​Therefore, If you think you have an injury that is related to your work, feel free to contact either John Bailey or myself  to discuss the circumstances of your injury.

Gillette injuries arise from minute repetitive trauma which result in a compensable work injury when their cumulative effect is sufficiently serious to disable the employee from further work..The term Gillette came from the Minnesota Supreme Court case, Gillette v. Harold, Inc.  

In most Gillette cases, the repetitive trauma occurs over a significant period of time.  An example of a Gillette injury would be a person whose job duties required a lot of repetitive overhead lifting.  Often times, a person will develop shoulder pain that develops over a period of time, until the pain becomes intolerable and requires the person to seek medical attention.  For example, if it was determined that the person had a torn rotator cuff, the person's work duties may very well be a substantial contributing factor that caused the rotator cuff tear.  Therefore, the rotator cuff tear would then be a compensable work injury.

​If you have an injury that has developed over time and you feel that it may be the result of your work duties, feel free to contact either John or myself and we would be happy to discuss your injury with you.  Thank you.